Showing posts with label Medicine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Medicine. Show all posts

Friday, July 20, 2012

Nature and Human Health... The Big Disconnect

(click on the image to see it larger)

I have previously written about why I, as a physician, among many other reasons, am so excited about what Permaculture can do for us as individuals and as communities (read that article here). I came across this chart yesterday and really wanted to share it. This comes from the David Suzuki Foundation, a Canadian-based organization with the following mission and vision:
  • Our mission is to protect the diversity of nature and our quality of life, now and for the future.
  • Our vision is that within a generation, Canadians act on the understanding that we are all interconnected and interdependent with nature.

I couldn't agree more with their goals. The bottom line is that we, as humans, truly need to be outside in nature. It is vital to our health. Take a close look at the graph, and tell me if you don't agree.

Thursday, July 19, 2012

How Then Should We Eat? ...some brief thoughts



As a primary care physician, and as a person who is now fifty pounds lighter than before I started medical school, I am frequently asked about health and food and diets. This is such a confusing topic for so many people. Unfortunately, I blame the medical establishment for much of this. I believe in their desire to do good, they have not only given blatantly conflicting information over the years, but they have also gotten so far in the weeds, so to speak, that they have lost touch with basic human history. They have lost touch with the traditions that were developed over thousands of years of trial and error, traditions that have shown time and again to be more healthy for the human body than whatever the current pop-science article tells the media outlets, and in turn tells us, and in turn causes more confusion when, a few years later, another article is written that tells us to do the exact opposite of what that first article told us! No wonder we are confused.

In addition, in the United States, the world melting pot of cultures, where little of those cultures remain intact, Americans are searching for their own traditional diet. Sadly, this relatively new traditional diet is almost nothing like what any traditional culture ate. This disconnect to real food is another major stumbling block for Americans.

So what are we to do? What do I tell my patients? My personal view is one that is grounded on a lot of medical, scientific, historical, and anthropologic reading. Maybe one day I will get around to writing all my thoughts on the topic. Today, I'll share one book, one theme, and one brochure...

I have previously endorsed Michael Pollan's In Defense of Food. This is a fantastic book written by a non-medical author, and it provides some simple but effective "food rules".

Probably the strongest recommendation is for the Paleo Diet... the concept, not necessarily one specific book (you can find thousands of websites on this topic, and I highly recommend spending some time reading about this). The Paleo Diet is really a concept that encourages us to eat a more "hunter-gatherer" diet. This is how humans were designed to eat before the advent of modern civilization and modern agriculture... and not coincidentally, modern chronic diseases. There are a dozen or more books on the topic, and they all share the same theme, some are more "strict" than others, but there are literally thousands of websites on the Paleo Diet, so no money needs to be spent learning all about it.

Finally, I will sharemy most recent find and recommendation, the Healthy 4 Life Booklet, from the Weston A. Price Foundation. If we (the "modern world") all ate how this booklet recommends, I think we would be significantly healthier than we are today. The link is at the end of this article.

Now before you dive into reading any of these things, I should give my disclaimer. While I don't agree 100% with everything that is in my reading recommendations, I agree with almost all of it (to be honest, I don't know if I would ever agree 100% with anything on which I have an opinion!). Also, some of these recommendations have ideas that seem to contradict each other... why is this and how do I reconcile it? Well, the Paleo Diet shows us that avoiding grains and starches can be healthy for us, and I agree. The other readings tell that there are healthy ways to eat these foods. I agree with this as well. My reconciliation is to minimize the consumption of grains and starches, definitely avoiding them as a primary component in my diet, and looking at ways traditional cultures ate them (fermentation and sprouting are two methods).

So, I hope this helps a few people who are struggling with making "healthy" food choices in this world of dietary confusion.


Here is the link to the Healthy 4 Life Booklet
Also, I'll add some information about the Weston A. Price Foundation...

FROM THE WESTON A. PRICE FOUNDATION MISSION STATEMENT:
The Weston A. Price Foundation is a nonprofit, tax-exempt charity founded in 1999 to disseminate the research of nutrition pioneer Dr. Weston Price, whose studies of isolated nonindustrialized peoples established the parameters of human health and determined the optimum characteristics of human diets. Dr. Price's research demonstrated that humans achieve perfect physical form and perfect health generation after generation only when they consume nutrient-dense whole foods and the vital fat-soluble activators found exclusively in animal fats.

The Foundation is dedicated to restoring nutrient-dense foods to the human diet through education, research and activism. It supports a number of movements that contribute to this objective including accurate nutrition instruction, organic and biodynamic farming, pasture-feeding of livestock, community-supported farms, honest and informative labeling, prepared parenting and nurturing therapies.

FROM THE HEALTHY 4 LIFE PRESS RELEASE:
As an alternative to the USDA lowfat, high-carbohydrate dietary guidelines, the Weston A. Price Foundation proposes Healthy 4 Life, a dietary plan in the form of a colorful booklet and poster featuring four food groups: animal foods; grains, legumes and nuts; vegetables and fruits; and healthy fats.

Rather than prescribe one-size-fits-all levels of macronutrients—fats, carbohydrates and proteins—the Healthy 4 Life plan recommends nutrient-dense versions of animal and plant foods, with particular emphasis on healthy traditional fats like butter, lard, egg yolks and coconut oil. The plan does not specify specific amounts of fats or carbohydrates because the need for these macronutrients varies with the individual. Those who engage in high levels of physical activity can incorporate more carbohydrates in the diet without gaining weight; those needing to lose weight or control blood glucose levels require more healthy fats in the diet as fats provide satiety and help keep blood sugar within a normal range.


The proposed 2010 USDA Dietary Guidelines perpetuate the mistakes of previous guidelines in demonizing saturated fats and animal foods rich in saturated fatty acids such as egg yolks, butter, whole milk, cheese, fatty meats like bacon and animal fats for cooking. The current obesity epidemic emerged as vegetable oils and refined carbohydrates replaced these healthy, nutrient-dense traditional fats. Animal fats supply many essential nutrients that are difficult to obtain from other sources.



Thursday, September 8, 2011

Book Review: Wilderness Medicine

 

As a physician and a Fellow in the Academy of Wilderness Medicine, I have to admit that I am a bit biased about this book.  It is the "bible" of Wilderness Medicine.  Let me be up front about it, this is a medical textbook.  This is a book written for physicians by physicians and Ph.D.'s.  It is not light reading.  It is over 2,300 pages without references - those were put on a disk in the back flap of the book!  I am not saying that this book cannot be read by a non-physician.  Please!  Physicians are just people.  They have studied for years to speak "medical", but it is not an entirely different language.  Besides, this book is written in a bit more laid back style than traditional medical textbooks.  There are tons of great photos and illustrations as well!

The book covers in great detail just about any topic dealing with medicine for the outdoors.  For example, and in no means all-inclusive, here are some topics: splints and slings, animal bites, plant induced skin rashes, high-altitude medical issues, underwater medical issues, travelling overseas, care for the elderly and very young in the wilderness, combat medicine, head injuries, broken bones, pain management, psychiatric issues in the wilderness, living off the land, cold-exposure injuries, heat-exposure injuries, and the list goes on and on and on.  While it is geared for the "wilderness", if you can imagine an injury or medical issue that could arise on a farm, then there is probably a chapter covering it in great depth.

Dr. Paul Auerbach, one of the co-founders of the Wilderness Medicine Society, besides being a great and approachable guy, has amassed a large collection of chapter writers who are experts in their fields.  I have been very fortunate to meet many of them, hear their lectures in person, discuss medical topics with them, and become friends with a few.  I really don't think you can get better information anywhere else.

If you are interested in living in a more rural area (or very isolated), or you visit these places, or you are just interested in having a great medical textbook on hand "just in case", and you have the ability and/or desire to work your way through a chapter that is not written at a fourth-grade reading level, then I highly recommend this book.

Friday, August 26, 2011

Herbal Medicines: Some Things to Consider



As there is growing interest in herbal medicines, treatments, and therapies, I thought I would lend my thoughts to the subject.  I will likely anger people on both sides of the argument.  It has been my experience that when there are two strongly opposed sides, the truth lies somewhere in between.

First:
Yes, I think there is a place for herbal medicine in modern healthcare.
Yes, I am an M.D.
Yes, I think some herbal treatments work.
Yes, I instruct some of my patients to use certain herbal medicines.
No, I do not think all herbal medicines work.
No, I am not corrupted or blinded or brainwashed by the evil pharmaceutical companies.

Second
I am not going to get into specific herbs right now.  I’ll save those for later posts  

Now let me get started… 

Statement: Modern physicians don’t like herbal medicine.
My Answer: That is, by and large, true.  
But why is that?  To be honest, there is some indoctrination to it.  As we go through our medical education, there are the random comments by some pious educators talking negatively or flat out mocking herbal medicine or those who use it.  It is unfortunate, but true.  Also, we see many people get really sick or who die because they were relying on herbal medicines for treatment of their medical conditions.  The vast majority of the time, these people are either very anti-establishment types (and wear a tinfoil hat to keep the government from reading their minds) or, sorry to say, are not the sharpest tool in the shed.   Finally, there is very little good research about herbal medicines (see my next section).  These reasons generally cause a lot of physicians to at the minimum remain very skeptical about herbal medicine.

Statement: Doctors say there is not any research to support herbal medicine use.  This is because the evil pharmaceutical companies are suppressing the truth. 
My Answer: The truth is there is very little good research on herbal medicine.  
Here’s why: Drug companies want to make money.  I know that the researchers who work for these companies truly want to help humanity.  I know many of them personally.  They are good people using their scientific brains to try and beat diseases the best they can.  The corporate side of things is different.  The management of drug companies want to turn a very healthy profit.  In part, this is a good thing.  The company makes drug A which treats disease 1 really well.  They make a profit.  They do research in disease 2.  They develop drug B which really works.  They make a profit.  They do research…. and on and on.  Overall, this model has saved millions of lives across the globe.  In the U.S., whole herbs are considered food products.  They cannot be patented.  Which means a drug company cannot charge $150 a month for using them.  Which means they have little interest in using the whole herb.  Since the vast majority of research into medicines is done, or at least funded, by drug companies, and they have no interest in a specific herb since there is no return of investment, then little research is done on it.

That is not to say that NO research is being done.  There are grants given out every year to investigate herbal treatments.  The National Institute of Health now has a Complimentary/Alternative Medicine branch to do research in herbal medicine.  It has been very interesting to see their results.  I must add, that the amount of high quality research into herbal medicines is growing quickly each year. 

Statement: There is a lot of research out there.  You don’t like it, because it shows herbal medicine works, and you are against herbal medicine. 
My Answer: There is a lot of research out there.  A lot of it is poorly done.

What makes research good or bad?

First, good research has a lot of people in the study.  What sounds more reliable: a study with 10 people or a study with 1000 people?

Second, good research uses randomization.  This means you separate the people in your study into different groups at random.  There are a lot of reasons why this is, and if you really want to know, I can give you a more detailed answer.  

Third, good research uses a placebo and/or a third medicine.  What sounds more reliable: a study that give 30 people herb X or a study that compares 10 people with herb X, 10 people with modern medicine Y, and 10 people with placebo Z.  (For those that do not know, a placebo is basically a fake medicine, like a "sugar pill")

Fourth, good research uses blinding.  This means the people in the study, and in really good studies the people giving the medicine, do not know if they are in the herbal medicine group, the modern medicine group, or the placebo group.  Single blinding is where the subjects do not know.  Double blinding is where the subject and researchers do not know (until after the study is done).

There is a lot more to it than that, but this is a good basis from which to start.  In reality, most herbal medicine studies rarely fit to any of the above standards.

But you say, “I have this book that says the research shows…”  In almost all cases, herbal medicine books offer very little proof that an herb works.  The book may say, “It has been used for hundreds of years for…”, or “according to this herbal medicine specialist…” or “patient X used it for this disease…”.  Where is the proof?  Who cares if it has been used for hundreds of years by the most well respected Chinese herbalists?  At one time people thought tomatoes were poisonous.  We believed the earth was flat!  Oftentimes, tradition has little in common with truth.  That is not to say these herbs do not work, it is just that tradition alone is not proof.

But you say, “This herb has been shown to kill cancer.”  LOTS of chemicals (including herbals) have been shown to kill cancer cells – in a petri dish!  There is a HUGE jump to say it will work in a human body the same way it worked in a petri dish.  If that is all the “research” you have, I would be very careful about using it, and I would never recommend it to others. 

Statement: “My mother had cancer and took this herb and now she is cancer free!” 
My Answer: I say that is wonderful!  But how do you know it was the herb that did it?  
In medicine, we are still learning how the immune system works and how the body repairs itself.  Would your mother have beat the cancer on her own anyway?  Was it that she stopped eating fast food and exercising more?  Was it the chemo?  Was it people praying for her?  

Whenever we have a story about herb X doing something for one person.  We call it anecdotal.  Practicing anecdotal medicine is very dangerous.  People die when we treat a disease a way that has not been studied well.  When we hear a bunch of stories about herb X healing people, that gets our attention.  If it is believable and preliminary studies (good research) shows there may be something to it, drug companies often jump into the game and try to isolate the chemical in the herb that is working.  That is how we got salicylic acid from willow bark (we now know it as aspirin). 

Statement: Herbs are safe because they are natural. 
My Answer: This is one of the most dangerous myths about herbal medicine.
Water is natural.  
Water in the right place, in the right amount, without contaminants, is safe.
Water in the lungs kills people every year – drowning.
Drinking too much water kills people every year – water toxicity.
Drinking too little water kills people every year – dehydration.
Drinking water with contaminants kills people every year – poisoning.
And this is just water, not a plant with so many more complicated chemicals.

Let’s look at this another way.

If a person is taking an herb, they expect it to do something to their body.  If it does something to their body, then it is what we call bioactive.  ANYTHING that is bioactive as a potential to interfere with a body's normal function.  That is the whole point!  We want the herb (or other medicine) to DO something to our bodies.  We hope that it is a good thing, something that will help us.  Bioactive compounds can have side effects.  They can interact with other medicines.  People can have allergic reactions to them.  People can die from the wrong dose, the wrong application, from a contaminant, from mistaking one herb for another… the list goes on.  

Just because a herbal medicine is from a plant does NOT mean it is safe. 

Statement: This herb will always work for this condition. 
My Answer: If someone tells you this, they are usually lying (either on purpose to sell you something, or because they are misinformed).
Plants are very dynamic life forms.  There is so much involved into why a plant produces certain chemicals or not.  The French have a term for it: terroir.  They used it to describe all the geographical components of the land their grapevines grow to produce great, good, or bad wine.  You can grow one plant with rich soil with certain percentages of minerals, with a certain sun/shade ratio, with a certain humidity level, with a certain amount of rain fall, with a certain temperature range, with a certain insect pest, with a certain sun angle, etc.  You can grow the same plant in a completely different terroir, and the chemicals in the plant will be very different.  One plant may help with headaches, and the other makes them worse.  One plant may boost your immune system, while the other does nothing, or gives you an allergic reaction.  One plant may calm you if you drink it as a tea, the other may give you insomnia.  This is why the drug companies try to isolate the bioactive compounds that give certain results (and then they can patent that chemical and make money of course.)

Certain bioactive compounds in plants are very reliable, and some are very unreliable.  It takes good research, great record keeping, and usually quite a bit of time and experience to know which plants will produce which bioactive compounds under which conditions.

Statement: I’ll go to the store and pick up a bottle of herb X. 
My Answer: Don’t count of Herb X being in a bottle marked Herb X.
What?!  That is right.  Since there is no government organization (NOT THAT WE NEED ANOTHER ONE!!!!!!)  to monitor herbal medicine content (remember, they are sold as food, not medicine), there is no guarantee that what is on the label is actually in the bottle.  A very large, very well done study examined this issue.  The researchers went and bought a bunch of bottles of herbal medicines from different companies and from different stores across the U.S.  The results were that about 70% of the bottles contained some form of the plant.  It may have been the root or leaves or flowers, but most samples did not specify which part.  This is important if you are looking for a root or a flower specifically, and that bottle only contains leaves.  The study also showed that 30% did not even contain the herb that was printed on the bottle!  The bottom line is that there is poor quality control in the herbal medicine business.

Statement:  You sound very negative about herbal medicines, but you say you tell you patients to use them. 
My answer: Be skeptical.
In an ideal world, we would know exactly how and where to grow our herbal medicine.  We would know what dose to use and how to take it.  We would be able to go to the store and buy the herbs we cannot grow ourselves and trust what was on the label.  Right now we can do none of those things with 100% certainty.  

So now what?  

Investigate the evidence for using an herb you are considering.  Try to find the research and read it yourself.  A lot may be technical, but you can get the general idea if it is good research or not.

Get a good book on herbs side effects and interactions (The Physician’s Desk Reference for Herbal Medicines is a great one).

Grow your own herbs if you can so you know what you are actually getting.  My advice is to grow your herbs in different micro-climates on your land and see which ones are better at treating the condition they are traditionally known for.

If you have to buy your herbs, do your research into the company that makes it.  What are their quality controls?  

Let your physician know what herbs you are using, so they can help you best.  If your physician says not to take it, ask them for the reasons.  If they have none (which likely means that physician is just anti-herbs), consider finding a new physician.  If they can give you a reason with evidence to support it, then take their advice.  

Hope this helps. 

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Medical Topic: How to Survive a Vehicle Submersion

While this is primarily a Permaculture blog, I am still a physician.  I will from time to time have a Medical Topic covering an issue that I feel is important. 


Car that slid off the road into a semi-frozen lake.

Last year I attended a conference in Utah put on by the Wilderness Medicine Society.  One lecture topic that was eye-opening was on Vehicle Submersions.
 
Gordon Giesbrecht conducting research.

Dr. Gordon Giesbrecht from the University of Manitoba gave a great presentation on his research of dumping over 50 cars and trucks (with people inside) into lakes.  His research has shown, and debunked common myths, best way to survive if you find yourself in this situation.
 
I'll summarize here:
  • 350-400 people die each year in the U.S. and Canada when they accidentally drive into a lake or river.
  • Of all types of vehicle accidents, vehicle submersion has the highest rate of death.
  • Based on polling data, the average person does not know the way to survive a vehicle submersion.
  • Most people will grab their cell phone and call 911 or a friend.  This wastes the 50 seconds (average) that a person can get out of a car and survive.  If you stay in the car longer than 50 seconds, your chance if living almost drops to zero.  We listened to 911 recordings of people who spent over a minute talking to the operator trying to describe where they were and find out what to do… all of them died a few minutes later.
  • The average car will sink in 60-90 seconds.
  • The average multi-ton truck used for snow-plowing will sink in less than 10 seconds.
  • The car will fill-up COMPLETELY with water shortly after it sinks.
  • THERE IS NO AIR POCKET!!! (okay, RARELY will an air pocket form, but only if the car stays horizontal (very rare) and settles gently on the bottom (also very rare)).
  • Most vehicles will flip right side up in a few seconds regardless of how they entered the water (sideways, upside down, etc.) before they start to sink.
  • Most vehicles will tip forward (due to the weight of the engine) and will sink to the bottom headlights first - all the air escapes through the back seat and out the back of the car so no air pocket forms.
  • Most people CANNOT kick in a window to break it (unless you practice!):  This was tested multiple times on dry land by many different sized and strength individuals.  For those that did break the window, it took more time than they would have before the car filled with water.  You can’t hold your breath and exert yourself hard at the same time!  They did develop a “trick” though.  If you kick at the bottom angle of the window closest to the hinge, then you have a greater chance of breaking the glass.  I will now be carrying a glass breaking tool in my car – IN AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE PLACE (like hanging from my rear view mirror or on my kechain).  Here is a great one that I make no money on: Res-Q-Me
  • Crank windows are best in cars!
  • Electric windows will not work once the computer that runs the motor gets wet.
  • NEVER try to open the door!  The pressure of the water against the sinking vehicle will slam it shut hard (maybe trapping an arm or hand – or chopping off a finger!).
  • A back hatch like in SUV’s and Minivans are a good means of escape if you have an inside latch – practice this!
  • YOU CAN CLIMB OUT A WINDOW WITH WATER RUSHING IN.  I watched multiple videos of people climbing out while water was rushing in. You do not need to wait for the car to fill up first.  
BOTTOM LINE:
1. Don’t touch your cell phone
2. Remove your seatbelt.
3. Get your child unbuckled (if a child or children are in the car).
4. Roll down your window or break it if you cannot roll it down.
5. Climb out of the car and swim to shore.
 
If you can do these steps (it takes less than 30 seconds if you know what to do first), your chance of surviving will be dramatically improved.

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Health Benefits of Grass Fed Meat

Grassfed is Best!

You can eat meat and be healthy!  In fact, you can eat meat and get more healthy than you are now.  I rarely say this seriously, but I will now... Trust me, I'm a doctor.  If the answer is not obvious from the title of this post, then let me be more specific.  The key to this "miracle" is in the pasture.  The key is eating grassfed meat.

Free-range or Pastured Chickens

"Grassfed" is a word used to convey the idea that an animal is fed primarily or solely from pasture (typically a mix of species, primarily grass-type plants).  Pretty simple in concept; however that is not what most of modern agriculture does.  "Grassfed Animal Products" refer mainly to meat, milk, cheese, and eggs.  Obviously, a lot of other animal products can be produced from animals on a grassfed diet, but these are the ones that are most researched.

Grass is best for most of our domesticated animals.  Think about it.  What do wild bison eat?  Grass!  Do wild sheep raise corn, wheat, and soybeans and then dine only on this?  No!  Then why do we feed our domestic animals these things?  Effecient production.  That is it.  Modern agriculture has deemed it appropriate to break with thousands of years of natural animal-food cycles and force animals to eat what they are not designed to eat in order to maximize growth and production.


 Besides the negative effects that modern feedlots have on animals' health (which is outlined extremely well in the book, An Omnivore's Dilema, which I wrote about in this post), there are real health consequences in humans that eat animals that were raised this way. 

Let me boldly say that I am against vegetarianism.  There are a number of reasons for this that I hope to outline in a future post, but suffice it to say that humans eat meat.  "Westernized" humans eat a lot of meat.  While there is a whole bunch of medical information out there to say we should cut back on our meat consumption for health reasons, almost all of that information considers only meat produced using the modern agricultural method.

I will provide some basic facts about grassfed meat.  I will provide some additional sources for more information at the end of this post.  But the information I am about to provide is very legitimate.  I tell my patients this, because I feel that the research done on this is solid.
  • Grassfed meat is significantly lower in fat than grain-fed meat.
  • Grassfed meat can lower LDL (low density lipoprotein... bad cholesterol).
  • Grassfed meat has significantly less calories than grain-fed meat - about 15 calories per ounce (that is about 100 less calories for a 6 oz portion of steak).
  • Grassfed meat has 2-6 times the Omega-3 fatty acids than grain-fed meat (which is good for your heart and brain as well as improving your odds against cancer).
  • Pastured chickens can produce eggs that have up to 20 times the Omega-3 fatty acid as commercial eggs.
  • Grassfed meat and milk can contain up to 5 times the amount of Conjegated Linoleic Acid (CLA) as grain-fed meat and milk (the preliminary research on CLA looks very promising on cancer prevention).
  • Grassfed meat has up to 4 times the vitamin E than grain-fed meat (vitamin E is a powerful antioxidant... which is good for heart, brain, and cancer).
  • Finally, Grassfed meat tastes really good!  Because it has less fat, you need to cook it a bit different.  I hope to give some more tips on cooking grassfed meat in the future.
 For those that are more visually minded, here are a few charts that compare grassfed to grain-fed meat:

Comparisons of Fat Content in commercial meats.

The same information from the previous chart in a different format.

Comparing Fat Content of commercial to wild meats

Look how fast the healthy Omega-3's disappear after coming off a grass diet!

Vitamin E content in commercial meats.

 Here are some links to a couple of articles on Grassfed meat:
Women's Health article on Grassfed Meat
 
Take a look at http://www.eatwild.com/ for locating sources of Grassfed meat - this is a fantastic resource!

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Survival Medicine Videos on YouTube

So, this is a bit of a different kind of post.  There are a LOT of video links, but they are really good.

Being a physician who is very interested in Wilderness Medicine and self-sufficiency, it is not uncommon for "non-medical" people to ask me about "medical things" they could do at home.  There is so much great information on the internet, but there is also a lot of bad information on the internet.  So how do you determine what is good or not?  Here is one series of videos that I would recommend.  While not the best video or audio quality, the content is very good.

The following videos have been created by Dr. Eric Wilke who is an Emergency Medicine physician.  Based on his medical mission work around the world, he wanted to give solid and reliable medical information for people "where there is no doctor".  These videos have good information on a variety of topics, and they are a great place to start learning how to be more medically self-sufficient.

#1 Intro and Disclaimer


#2 Strep Throat - be sure to watch both parts

#3 Influenza - be sure to watch both parts

#4 Diarrhea


#5 Oral Rehydration Formula


#6 Potable Water


#7 Dental Infections


#8 Dental Pain


#9 Dental Trauma

#10 Broken Teeth

#11 Dental Kit

#12 The WAPI (Pasteurizing Water)

#13 Medication Shelf Life

#14 Where there is No Doctor - a book review (highly recommend this free book)

#15 Soft Tissue Infections

#16 Civilian Application of Combat Casualty Care

#17 Field Treatment of Gunshot Wounds

#18 How to Start an IV

#19 Honey for Wounds

#20 Cold Related Injuries

#21 Worldwide Top Killers

#22 Lower Respiratory Tract Infections

#23 Obtaining Prescription Medications... legally!

#24 Clavicle Fractures

#25 Radiation Exposure 
(very interesting considering the fairly recent events in Japan)

#26 Basic Extremity Fracture Care

Monday, July 11, 2011

Where There is No Doctor


Where There is No Doctor is likely the most widely distributed health education book in the world.  It was written by David Werner, a biologist and public health professor, who was doing health care work in Mexico.  He founded The Hesperian Foundation which distributes free versions of this book as downloadable PDFs on their website.  The Hesperian Foundation has since created many other books that contain great information.


I highly recommend having these books as part of a general home self-care medical library.  While not as necessary in the developed world where we have pretty easy access to healthcare... and I am especially comparing us to developing countries... we never know when we may be faced with a Hurricane Katrina or a 2004 Tsunami and our access to care suddenly becomes very limited or just plain gone for an unknown amount of time.  I am really not an alarmist, but I do try to hold true to the Boy Scout motto: Be Prepared.

Here are the links to download these great resources:
Where There is No Doctor
Where Women Have No Doctor
A Book for Midwives
Where There is No Dentist

Also, here is their main download page.  Follow this link to find these books in Spanish as well as a few other free downloads.

Finally, if you are interested in having the whole book, you can follow the link at the top of the page to purchase one from Amazon.